Think those chemicals have been tested?

On Saturday, April 13, 2013, the NY Times posted an article with this exact title.  The article was forwarded to me by my dear friend Jennie Sherwin.  Jennie will also have a blog post up sometime today on this article as well.

You will want to read the entire article here.  I am, however, going to give you a snippet of what the article is about.

Industrial chemicals, unlike its counterparts pharmaceuticals and pesticides, do not have to be tested before being put on the market.  Rarely are producers required to provide the government with information to assess safety.

These companies are not required to provide safety data when notifying the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) about new chemicals.  If the EPA does not block the chemical within 90 days, the chemical is by default given the go ahead.  According to the NY Times article, the EPA has only succeeded in banning or restricting polychlorinated biphenyls, dioxin, hexavalent chromium (probably due to Erin Brockovich and all the complainants in Hinkley, CA), asbestos and chlorofluorocarbons.

Federal officials could not say if the chemicals used in the clean up in the BP oil spill were safe either.

The Safe Chemicals Act of 2013 has been introduced which would require the chemical industry to demonstrate that a chemical is safe before they could be sold.  Of course the chemical industry is against this bill.  Another bill is expected to be introduced which would likely win support by the chemical companies because it might demand less data or testing.

Hazardous chemicals are suspected to show up in the blood of new-born babies as I mentioned in a previous post.  Knowing how I react to chemicals makes me deeply concerned of the idea that babies are born with these chemicals in their blood streams.

Pesticide and pharmaceuticals may require safety data but how many drugs and pesticides have been pulled off the shelves or banned long after they were deemed safe?  So just imagine the 85,000 industrial chemicals used today that have not been even required to show they are safe.

If you haven’t read enough, check out this video that a friend posted on her Facebook page recently.

Does this make you angry?  It does me!

15 responses to “Think those chemicals have been tested?

  1. Kathy:

    Happy Earth Day! Thanks for bringing the issue of unregulated chemicals to the attention of your followers. We all need to be vigilant.


  2. SOOOOO angry! How has the EPA only banned so few????? 😦 ugh

  3. This is so disturbing. We need a legion of Erin Brockovich clones. Or, can we do something?

  4. Pingback: Unacceptable Levels | allergictolifemybattle

  5. I think I’ll go through my personal care stuff and see what chemicals are int them.

  6. Reblogged this on quirkywritingcorner and commented:
    The video is 15 min long, but worth the time if you’d like to know something about the dangers of the chemicals going into/onto your body.

  7. Reblogged this on Life in the City with a Future and commented:
    I was putting together my sixth post on “How to Make Your House Less Toxic on a Budget.” I have been asked, “so what are some of the toxic chemicals?” I was just going to put a link on my post but I think that the post Kathyrn has put together needs to stand on its own. It is very impactful.

  8. Pingback: How to Make Your Home Less Toxic on a Budget: Part 6A Personal Care Products | Life in the City with a Future

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s